FrontRow

Too Many Cybersecurity Priorities? How to Decide What to Fix First

Secarma shows how to prioritise security work when it all looks urgent.

Recorded · added 3 October 2026
Online
RecordingCybersecurityGovernance, Risk & ComplianceIT Leadership & StrategyFree

About this session

Pen test findings, audit actions, compliance requirements, customer requests and internal projects can quickly pile up into a list where everything looks urgent. This recorded session from Secarma sets out a practical way to bring those priorities into one view and decide what genuinely needs doing first.

It covers assessing each item by risk, business impact and dependencies, separating urgent fixes from foundational work and longer-term improvements, avoiding the trap of letting the loudest issue become the top priority, and what a realistic 12-month roadmap should contain, including the actions worth tackling in the first 90 days.

I've sat through a lot of Secarma's webinars, and they reliably focus on method over sales, which suits a topic like this.

What you’ll learn

How to rank competing security work by risk, impact and dependencies, and turn it into a 90-day plan

Who it’s for

IT managers and security, risk or compliance leads sitting on a backlog of findings from different assessments, who need to justify where time and budget go first.

Keep going

Something wrong with this listing? Tell us and we will put it right.